Fragmented controls
Identity, endpoint, cloud and data protection tools are managed separately with no shared visibility.
Microsoft security stack
You're probably already paying for Microsoft security. Let's actually use it.
Most organizations on Microsoft 365 E5 own a serious security stack — Defender, Sentinel, Entra, Purview — and use a fraction of it. We deploy and integrate these tools so they work as a system: identity, detection, response and data protection reinforcing each other, instead of licenses sitting idle.
Discuss Microsoft Security
Architecture
flowchart LR
U[User and Device] -->|1 sign-in| ENTRA[Entra ID]
ENTRA -->|2 evaluate| CA{Conditional Access}
CA -->|risky| MFA[MFA Challenge]
CA -->|trusted| TOKEN[Scoped Token]
MFA --> TOKEN
TOKEN -->|3 least privilege| APP[App or Resource]
APP --> LOG[Sign-in Logs]
Business challenges
Microsoft Security challenges we solve.
Every recommendation starts with business pressure, technical risk and the operating model required after launch.
Unclear security ownership
Teams are unsure which controls are active, who owns them and what still needs configuring.
Slow incident response
Alerts from different Microsoft tools are not connected into one response workflow.
Solution overview
Microsoft Security designed for production readiness.
We deploy and integrate these tools so they work as a system: identity, detection, response and data protection reinforcing each other, instead of licenses sitting idle.
Security architecture
Identity, endpoint, cloud posture and data protection designed as one connected system.
Defender alignment
Defender for Cloud, XDR and Endpoint configured and tuned across the estate.
Sentinel readiness
Log sources onboarded and analytics rules tuned to the environment.
Identity controls
Entra ID and Purview connected into a unified response path.
Architecture model
A practical delivery architecture before implementation begins.
We define the target operating model, controls, integration points and ownership path before building, so the solution can be supported after launch.
CloudevTech
Enterprise delivery model
01
Discover
02
Architect
03
Implement
04
Validate
05
Operate
Our approach
Structured delivery from discovery to operational handover.
Every engagement is shaped around the service goal, current constraints and the operating model your team needs after launch.
Assess the current stack
Review identity, endpoint, cloud posture and data protection configuration.
Design a unified architecture
Connect Defender, Sentinel, Entra ID and Purview into one operating model.
Implement controls
Configure and tune each control area based on the design.
Connect response workflows
Link signals across tools into one operational response path.
Business benefits
Outcomes designed for decision makers and delivery teams.
Benefits are framed around measurable improvement, operating confidence and reduced delivery risk.
Unified security architecture
Identity, endpoint, cloud posture and data protection are designed as one connected system.
Clear control ownership
Each security control has a defined owner and a documented operating state.
Faster detection to response
Signals from across the Microsoft stack feed one operational response path.
Technology stack
Implemented with proven platforms and tools.
Technology choices are confirmed during discovery, with a preference for reliable, maintainable platforms your team can support.
Microsoft Defender
Microsoft Sentinel
Entra ID
Purview
Defender for Cloud
SOC 2 shouldn't be a two-week panic before the audit.
Continuous control visibility and repeatable remediation for SOC 2 readiness.
Read the story ->
FAQ
Common questions before engagement.
Short answers to common planning questions for Microsoft Security.
We have E5 but barely use the security features. Common?
Very. The fastest security ROI is often turning on what you already own.
Do these tools replace our other security products?
Sometimes — we'll tell you honestly where consolidation makes sense and where it doesn't.
Enterprise consultation
Book a consultation